Episode 88: Probable Claus

Episode 88

13th December 2012

Andrew brings this week’s case against his wife Alex. The birth of their first child last year made real a long-running dispute which had been hypothetical up until that point: should parents foster a belief in Santa Claus? Andrew says no — he believes perpetuating the Santa myth damages parents’ credibility, and he doesn’t appreciate a fictional character getting the glory for bringing the best gifts. Alex says yes — she claims Andrew is unable to appreciate the joy Santa brings to children because he grew up without the belief himself. Who is right? Judge John Hodgman decides.

Episode notes

Andrew brings this week’s case against his wife Alex. The birth of their first child last year made real a long-running dispute which had been hypothetical up until that point: should parents foster a belief in Santa Claus? Andrew says no — he believes perpetuating the Santa myth damages parents’ credibility, and he doesn’t appreciate a fictional character getting the glory for bringing the best gifts. Alex says yes — she claims Andrew is unable to appreciate the joy Santa brings to children because he grew up without the belief himself. Who is right? Judge John Hodgman decides.

Thanks again to The Cave in Long Island City, New York for generously allowing us to use their recording facilities this week and to engineer Marcus Parks. The Cave hosts several comedy podcasts, and you can find them at CaveComedyRadio.com.

 

STREAM OR DOWNLOAD THIS PODCAST
VIEW THE EVIDENCE
SUBSCRIBE TO THIS PODCAST in ITUNES or the RSS FEED

EVIDENCE

Evidence from Andrew
Exhibit A:

“A photo of our son Everest dressed as Santa Claus.”

Exhibit B:

“A photo of Everest opening a Christmas present that is decorated in Santa Claus wrapping paper.”

Exhibit C:
“A link to one analysis of how children believe in Santa more than other fantasies because the information comes from their parents, a trusted source.”

 

In this episode...

Video Editor
Audio Editor
Social Media Specialist

About the show

Have your real-life disputes settled in Fake Internet Court! Despite no legal background, Judge John Hodgman and Bailiff Jesse Thorn are the arbiters of justice that you need. No case is too big or too small. They judge them all!
Is a hot dog a sandwich? When does a collection become a hoard? Is it ever ok to flush soup down a toilet? Only one can decide! Submit your dispute at maximumfun.org/jjho!

People

Video Editor

Audio Editor

Social Media Specialist

How to listen

Stream or download episodes directly from our website, or listen via your favorite podcatcher!

Share this show

New? Start here...