Episode 20: An Appeel-ate Decision Case

Episode 20

14th April 2011

Friends (and Canadian barristers) Nick and Phil bring this fruit-based case: which gentleman’s technique for peeling a banana is correct?

Episode notes

Friends (and Canadian barristers) Nick and Phil bring this fruit-based case: which gentleman’s technique for peeling a banana is correct?

You may view the evidence for this case behind the jump, and subscribe to the podcast in iTunes or through this RSS feed.

Nick’s Evidence

Exhibit A: A video showing him “opening a banana the correct way and demonstrating the ridiculousness of my friend’s method.”

Exhibit B: “A screenshot of my friend’s Facebook status from 2008 which gave rise to this long standing debate.”

Additionally, Nick has submitted and the Judge refers to the video “How to Peel a Banana Like a Monkey.”

Phil’s Evidence

Exhibits A-D: Phil opens a banana by his own method.

In this episode...

Video Editor
Audio Editor
Social Media Specialist

About the show

Have your real-life disputes settled in Fake Internet Court! Despite no legal background, Judge John Hodgman and Bailiff Jesse Thorn are the arbiters of justice that you need. No case is too big or too small. They judge them all!
Is a hot dog a sandwich? When does a collection become a hoard? Is it ever ok to flush soup down a toilet? Only one can decide! Submit your dispute at maximumfun.org/jjho!

People

Video Editor

Audio Editor

Social Media Specialist

How to listen

Stream or download episodes directly from our website, or listen via your favorite podcatcher!

Share this show

New? Start here...