Episode 132: Criminal In Tent

Episode 132

25th October 2013

April and her boyfriend Walter share a grand, romantic plan for the future: to buy a piece of land and build their own home. However, they disagree on which type of structure they should build. April thinks a small, wooden house would be best, but Walter believe he’s better suited to a yurt-dwelling lifestyle. Who is right? Judge John Hodgman decides.

Episode notes

April and her boyfriend Walter share a grand, romantic plan for the future: to buy a piece of land and build their own home. However, they disagree on which type of structure they should build. April thinks a small, wooden house would be best, but Walter believe he’s better suited to a yurt-dwelling lifestyle. Who is right? Judge John Hodgman decides.

If you want to join our conversation about this episode, please click on the Forum link below!

Thanks to Elizabeth Loring for suggesting a variation of this week’s case name! To suggest a title for a future episode, like us on Facebook at Judge John Hodgman! We regularly put a call for submissions.

STREAM OR DOWNLOAD THIS PODCAST
SUBSCRIBE TO THIS PODCAST in ITUNES or the RSS FEED

 

In this episode...

Video Editor
Audio Editor
Social Media Specialist

About the show

Have your real-life disputes settled in Fake Internet Court! Despite no legal background, Judge John Hodgman and Bailiff Jesse Thorn are the arbiters of justice that you need. No case is too big or too small. They judge them all!
Is a hot dog a sandwich? When does a collection become a hoard? Is it ever ok to flush soup down a toilet? Only one can decide! Submit your dispute at maximumfun.org/jjho!

People

Video Editor

Audio Editor

Social Media Specialist

How to listen

Stream or download episodes directly from our website, or listen via your favorite podcatcher!

Share this show

New? Start here...