Episode 494: Cat-or-Dogical Imperative

Episode 494

25th November 2020

Alan files suit against his wife, Elaine. He’d like to get another cat. Elaine, however, would prefer adding a dog to their family. Who’s right? Who’s wrong?

Episode notes

Alan files suit against his wife, Elaine. Alan thinks their cat, Muffin, needs a companion. He’d like to get another cat. Elaine, however, would prefer adding a dog to their family. Who’s right? Who’s wrong?

The Shaggy DA:

Links discussed in this episode:

Thank you to Andrew Eppler Zindell for naming this week’s case! To suggest a title for a future episode, follow Judge John Hodgman on Facebook. We regularly put out a call for submissions.

SUBSCRIBE TO THIS PODCAST in APPLE PODCASTS or the RSS FEED

In this episode...

Video Editor
Audio Editor
Social Media Specialist

About the show

Have your real-life disputes settled in Fake Internet Court! Despite no legal background, Judge John Hodgman and Bailiff Jesse Thorn are the arbiters of justice that you need. No case is too big or too small. They judge them all!
Is a hot dog a sandwich? When does a collection become a hoard? Is it ever ok to flush soup down a toilet? Only one can decide! Submit your dispute at maximumfun.org/jjho!

People

Video Editor

Audio Editor

Social Media Specialist

How to listen

Stream or download episodes directly from our website, or listen via your favorite podcatcher!

Share this show

New? Start here...

Liked Episode 494: Cat-or-Dogical Imperative? Listen to these next...