Episode 435: Snickerdoodiligence

Episode 435

2nd October 2019

Rachel files suit against her husband, Doug. Early in their marriage, she brought cookies to his family’s Christmas Eve celebration. Doug and his brothers realized the cookies were similar to a beloved family recipe that had been lost to time. 20 years later, Doug and his brothers still refer to these cookies as their “Great […]

Episode notes

Rachel files suit against her husband, Doug. Early in their marriage, she brought cookies to his family’s Christmas Eve celebration. Doug and his brothers realized the cookies were similar to a beloved family recipe that had been lost to time. 20 years later, Doug and his brothers still refer to these cookies as their “Great Grandma Hebig’s cookies.” But, Rachel thinks she deserves the credit for cookies.

Who’s right? Who’s wrong?

 

EVIDENCE

 

Thank you to Jeremy Frank for naming this week’s case! To suggest a title for a future episode, follow Judge John Hodgman on Facebook. We regularly put out a call for submissions.

 

SUBSCRIBE TO THIS PODCAST in APPLE PODCASTS or the RSS FEED

In this episode...

Video Editor
Audio Editor
Social Media Specialist

About the show

Have your real-life disputes settled in Fake Internet Court! Despite no legal background, Judge John Hodgman and Bailiff Jesse Thorn are the arbiters of justice that you need. No case is too big or too small. They judge them all!
Is a hot dog a sandwich? When does a collection become a hoard? Is it ever ok to flush soup down a toilet? Only one can decide! Submit your dispute at maximumfun.org/jjho!

People

Video Editor

Audio Editor

Social Media Specialist

How to listen

Stream or download episodes directly from our website, or listen via your favorite podcatcher!

Share this show

New? Start here...

Liked Episode 435: Snickerdoodiligence? Listen to these next...